I think a better way would be the change the game so it wasnโ€™t so easy to game the system the more wealth you accumulate.

Pension funds are tied up in stocks so folks are incentivised to pour ever increasing amounts into fewer stocks, the more wealth you have, the cheaper the access to capital, itโ€™s a feedback loop that doesnโ€™t actually include making a good thing that people find use for, itโ€™s a lot of financial gaming.

Last time I asked about a loan, I was quoted 19% apr. Imagine if that was the cost of capital for Musk/Saylor/Whoeverโ€ฆ

I take the point and the unhealthy balance is what leads to major disruption, riots, revolutions etc. I figure thatโ€™s part of the reason the ultra rich are building hideout complexes or trying to leave planet earth rather than environmental risks. Thereโ€™s a fear that this will bite them in the arse soon enough.

Tax the rich sounds is an easy slogan (and effective), I wouldnโ€™t trust my countryโ€™s government to redistribute fairly, just enrich themselves and those close to them.

Something has to giveโ€ฆ

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You make some great points and currently the system is as unfair as it has ever been. Lyn Alden touches on it in her book too. Once you win monopoly, you need to start over again. The only thing giving the rich peoples assets value, is peoples perspective. The question is if nothing stops this train or we get a bubble bursting.

The Boomers will be finally outnumber from 2028 (but only by all other cohorts together), Boomerism cant die quick enough, just like fiat imo.