It definitely isn’t defense and Israel should have been left to finish what they started, I agree.
But from the US operation I don’t see any war crimes.
Israel sure is being treated differently than Putin as the aggressor tho.
Discussion
Here’s a balanced breakdown of the situation — not propaganda, not apologetics — just a clean dissection of what’s at play:
---
🧭 Is the US strike on Iran self-defense or aggression?
Not strictly self-defense, under international law.
✅ What the US would argue:
Preemptive self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter.
Iran had enriched uranium to 60%, was stockpiling it, and could go to weapons-grade quickly.
Israel had already been attacked (or attacked first — murky).
The US claims it was preventing a nuclear-armed regional adversary from emerging.
❌ But legally:
Preemptive self-defense is not universally accepted as valid under international law unless an attack is imminent.
There was no imminent Iranian nuclear attack provable in public.
The UN was not consulted, and no resolution backed the strike.
🔎 Verdict: Not a war crime, but arguably illegal under international norms — unless the world accepts “anticipatory self-defense” as legitimate (which opens Pandora’s box).
---
🧨 Was it a war crime?
No evidence of civilian targets.
Targeted military-nuclear infrastructure.
Bunker-buster precision weapons, not area bombing.
No reported civilian casualties (so far).
🔎 Verdict: Not a war crime by Geneva Conventions standards.
But also not sanctioned by a multilateral legal process — it’s unilateral hard power.
---
🕍 Why is Israel treated differently than Putin?
🔥 Israel:
Bombed Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran — often without UN support.
Receives Western immunity despite high civilian casualties.
Faces soft diplomatic pressure or delayed ICJ processes, not sanctions.
🔥 Russia (Putin):
Invaded Ukraine in 2022.
Faced massive sanctions, ICC war crimes warrants, and global condemnation.
Every Russian strike = “aggression” in Western media.
🔎 Hypocrisy? Absolutely.
Why the difference?
1. Israel is a key Western ally, deeply embedded in US defense architecture.
2. Russia is outside the Western sphere, a rival, and seen as destabilizing Europe.
3. Media framing: The Western press is selective in outrage based on strategic alignment.
---
🧠 Strategic Analysis:
The US didn’t commit war crimes in this strike — it executed a surgical, high-tech destruction of nuclear facilities.
But it did so without legal multilateral backing, like most of its Middle East interventions.
Israel’s unchecked actions have emboldened US escalation, but also exposed the double standards the Global South rails against.
---
Final Verdict:
> The US strike is not a war crime — but it is part of an ongoing pattern of selectively applied international law.
> And yes — Israel is treated differently than Putin, and this undermines the very rules-based order the West claims to uphold.
---
Let me know if you want:
Comparison chart: US vs Russia vs Israel actions & global responses
A UN Charter breakdown on “anticipatory self-defense”
A brutal global South critique meme or speech format
Yea sure. Nice hit!
So basically the usa has suppressed a regional power to stablize its proxy. Gotcha . India Pakistan China Russia ,..pls take notes