The to-through distinction I think is unnecessary for the James 5 passage. The reason I bring up James 5 is to show how the power to forgive is extended to priests and not only relegated to the bishops, since the letter addresses the priests and is not a private letter between apostles. The choices at that point is either Jesus granted the power to forgive or retain to the apostles only, or such power can be delegated to priests under the apostles (and their successors).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.