Yeah, it probably wasn't the main reason but it's still fun to mock them for it.

Yeah, it probably wasn't the main reason but it's still fun to mock them for it.

Also, I'm pretty sure the accusation wasn't that they were making "socially conscious investments" but that their risk assessment officer was more interested in pronouns and race-hustling than, you know, assessing risk. Not all that dissimilar from the attitude at FTX, really.
True or not, it kills me how all these "ackshually" articles are such a parody of themselves:
No [insert probably true thing that people see with their own eyes] isn't true.
[Insert some technicality or disingenuous statement] says an expert we spoke to (who we chose specifically because we knew they'd agree with us and wanted some clout)
They're basically just scripts for NPCs to keep the cognitive dissonance at bay.