The question of _sola scriptura_ isn't one of private interpretation, but focuses on the question of _authority_. What happens when so-called 'tradition' adds to, or even contradicts, Scripture? "God alone is Lord of the conscience." The Reformers were zealous to say that Scripture carries the authority of its Author: the authority of Scripture is passively _recognized_ by the church, it is not actively _bestowed_ by The Church. All that is necessary for life and godliness has been set down in Scripture and it is made effective by the work of the Holy Spirit in our hearts. Rome would say something like 'prima Scriptura' - Scripture is the primary, but not the 'alone' authority. It is 'primarly Scripture' but mediated and properly interpreted only by the Magisterium--"oh, and you can't see the Files for yourselves. Trust us, bro." Luther was Snowden, Luther was Assange, releasing the files for all to see, read, study, and understand. The doctrine of sola scriptura is: don't trust [human leaders], verify [by going straight to the source] -- like the Bereans in Acts 17:11.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.