You may not see the value in defending and persisting your ethnic heritage and the culture of your forefathers, but you are in the minority.

As a Christian I don't believe in paganisms like reincarnation and I think Zen Buddhism has rekt a lot of new age people in the West.

There is no real argument for reparations. Overt slavery was the norm for all of history and only in recent times, since Great Britain and America outlawed it, that we now enjoy the current period of relative freedom which is totally singular and unique in the story of mankind.

Christ is truth and has a monopoly over it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I hope I’m in the minority because the majority of people are idiots who do whatever their tribe tells them to the point of injecting themselves and their children with pharmaceutical conglomerate poison.

Why would I blindly defend the culture of my forefathers, right or wrong? I am an individual, not a member of a collective. I will defend the culture of free speech and civil liberties of the US because I believe they are essential to human prosperity, not due to the accident of being American. A child inherits his values, but an adult must choose them.

I understand you believe Christ has a monopoly over truth, but you could very well be wrong, as you are just a man, and man is fallible.

"I am an individual, not a member of a collective."

You are both.

Your family is a collective.

Your ancestors are a collective.

Your nation is a collective.

A man who belongs to no groups whatsoever is utterly and terribly lost.

Empty words. Humans are a collective. Fish are a collective. Any plural noun denoting living creatures is a collective.

Animals act according to instincts and the behavior of the herd. An individual chooses to have a family, to be part of a culture, to take on responsibilities, not because his ancestors did it, not because his peers are doing it, not because it’s expected of him, but because he values it.

You got me, man. Out here advocating for mass illegal immigration per Satan’s plan! No chance I just have a simple disagreement re the importance of race and ethnicity and put my emphasis on choice at the individual level. Straw man is much softer than the steel man.

“Fish” are not a collective because different types of fish will eat each other. That’s the part you’re missing here.

People with shared culture and biological history can form high-trust societies, but import foreigners and make your country a “melting pot” and you’ll have big social problems.

Deny that all you want but other people don’t play using your rules, and will not forgive you for having made a poor model of the world.

I think there is a core confusion and overreaction which has plagued the right or late. Illegal immigration is bad. Mass illegal immigration is worse. Unvetted mass illegal immigration of people who don’t share your values and don’t respect your country is the nut low.

I think the evidence for that is clear. But here’s where they overreact and lose the plot.

America is a country of immigrants. It’s the most prosperous country in the history of the world. People of disparate ancestry creating untold wealth for society, despite the parasites, corruption, etc. How is this possible?

Because the foundational axioms of the US (the constitution, rule of law, private property, etc.) were the best. You didn’t have India’s caste system, Europe’s strict class divisions, or the communist regimes. You had a system where the individual who applied himself could thrive (with notable exceptions.)

The solution to one’s country losing its core axioms upon which its prosperity depends is only to let in those who are willing to adopt them. You don’t need to worry about racial makeup or quotas, just values. You need to vet people, make the process simple bureaucratically but arduous in terms of demonstrating fitness. No vetting system is perfect, but a strong one will ensure the people who arrive believe in American values. Free speech, private property, civil liberties, etc.

If your religion or culture is antithetical to these things, and you are insistent upon it, that’s fine, but you’re not entitled to live in America. There’s no need to adopt the identity politics of the left. It’s just merit based and voluntarily.

I agree with all of this, in theory. In practice, a lot of the success of America was driven by a strong culture of shared Christian values and a free and capitalist economy. We are losing both of those, and that is a huge problem for our country.

Democracy and our founding principles are amazing tools in a world with some level of baseline social cohesion. They do not work in every situation.

It seems like we agree on way more than we disagree. If you acknowledge that immigration currently is an issue, then we are on the same page.

We can dream of a vetting process based on values, ran by great people who want the best for us, but while we dream about that we will become a minority in our own homelands.

The “overreaction” is our culture and races immune system. It’s not always justified, but it certainly is something to be thoughtful about.

Yeah, I can understand the reaction, but you don’t want to make a leftist solution to a leftist problem. Group-identity is a communist ideal. Rugged individualism based on Western values, many of which did come from Christianity, is the culture I would choose. Dissent from everything and everyone, carve your own path, don’t do things because other people think you should.

You may choose that culture in thought, but I guarantee you don’t currently live in it. That’s why people like me react the way that we do.

The real world has been becoming a commie welfare state filled with subsidized immigration, nihilism, anti-Christian values, corruption, sexual perversion, and white guilt. And that is a big problem which didn’t happen organically and will need to be addressed.

I agree with this.

Based. Carry on King.