Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ

i think part of the reason why arweave people understand it better is they already have a separation in their architecture between replicas and the consensus and the delivery API service, so it is simpler for them to think of their database as storage, indeed that's one of the whole points of their project is pretty much focused on storage so they have more realistic strategy about how to keep the cost contained and scaling replication to fit the use case instead of having a one-consensus-to-rule-them-all mentality

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

also, the replication strategy of farcaster is patently retarded it's just IPFS

and they are not gonna have a good time trying to make a total ordering, this is precisely what you can't make work at scale!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.