Interesting. Wasn’t familiar with that. Still - why do you think clients and serves are adopting blossom and not BitTorrent? What’s your explanation?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Maybe web browser compatibility, maybe just grifter mindset wanting to generate the profit of a seedbox without delivering the same quality of service

I don’t think “grifter mindset” is very common in the nostr developers ecosystem. To my understanding people are motivated mostly by technological passion and freedom values.

So I tend to think the reasons are mainly in the engineering realm.

That's ridiculous considering the level of lightning integration in the nostr ecosystem

Not even freedom valued enough to have more clients with Monero tipping

Maybe it’s because they find lightning to have more demand?

Demand by users. Not by buyers. As far as I understand no one currently making big bucks out of lightning in nostr

What’s the difference actually between blossom and seedboxes in your understanding?

BitTorrent should and does work well, blossom hasn't shown the same

What does it mean “it hasn’t shown the same”?

It works just fine for me. It’s just simple file hosting with hash addressing and mirroring.

It hasn't been tested by the authorities heavily targeting it the way BitTorrent has and it doesn't seem like it would hold up as well

I don’t know if “being tested” by authorities is one of the main objectives in this stage. And anyway I don’t see why it would be less effective in that aspect.

Blossom is much simple architecture. Basically the simplest approach apart of regular file hosting. This is major advantage. You basically get redundancy, censorship resistance and verifiability with almost no cost of complication. Maybe BitTorrent and seedboxers is also easy to integrate. But I don’t know. It seems more complex.

Seems to me like it just won't work in a context of real censorship resistance

Because

There's no reason it would work

It's basically not even p2p

There’s no reason nostr would work. It’s basically not even p2p

Yeah it's pretty broken, p2p version is one of the next vital improvements

Because

People like to have their posts show up for other users

Yes. That’s a great feature that nostr has

P2P nostr will have it more fully

Why?

Harder to stop users from getting posts delivered from/to each other's devices, harder to stop users from noticing when network isn't working good

Maybe. Nostr may adopt some p2p elements one day. P2P is way harder. That’s way nostr is not based on that (although it may get added one day). I think the same thing goes to blossom / BitTorrent question. Simplicity is important

Using what works is simple

BitTorrent works

Nostr almost does and nothing else is closer

Blossom also works. And Probably simple to integrate to nostr

Again, seems like it won't work when it's tried in a high risk context

Seems to you. Based on intuition i presume.

That intuitively sounds right

Yeah. I think I already got some feelings about the quality of your intuition

That's cause yours sucks 😞

Let me guess, that’s what your intuition told you

How did you know?

There's enough demand for apps with Bitcoin and doggie coin support