The divide I see is between technologists and monetary maximalists. People who are distracted by what CAN be done, often miss what SHOULD be done. The smartest ones are the most dangerous. We have a once in a species opportunity to fix the incentive system of the most important tool humans use and you want to misuse it. To do so, you and others have been social engineering chinks in the armor (core30 as the latest example) since the code didn’t allow to attack it without changes. You present as a libritarian technologist who just wants to push the boundaries of what can be done but what I see is antisocial manipulative behavior and a drive for undue power and influence. A wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Discussion
Sure, the divide is between folks who see how Bitcoin actually works vs those who would like for it to work differently.
And yet you have to social engineer holes in it for it to do what you want it to do. That’s like saying a Lamborghini can plow a farmers field because you welded a tractor implement to its rear bumper.
“If it wasn’t intended to be a plow, then why are there welding points under the bumper?”