Subnostr

I get where you’re coming from. I’m very “middle way” about this.

The privacy of non-kyc is something everyone should have the freedom to utilize. There also need to be as many easy on-ramps to self custodied Bitcoin as possible.

We also need to remember the massive range and diversity of Bitcoin users in the future. I may be comfortably KYC’d in the northeastern USA and not really need to worry about my sovereignty, but the billions of people living in less-free countries don’t necessarily have the luxury of being comfortable with KYC.

a_priori 2y ago

Holding KYC sats doesn't feel that dangerous right now, but who knows what the future holds. Things could get very bad in the death throes of the empire. Also, imagine a "happy" scenario where Bitcoin shoots to the moon, but your history is leaked and gets into nefarious hands. Now bad dudes know you're filthy rich... and they know where you live.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

boston wine 2y ago

🎯💯

BitcoinSandy 2y ago

All good points, I really meant that non kyc is not straight forward for the average person as they don’t operate like that. But yes unbanked masses need to buy non kyc from start. However they will just trade anyhow as they are using it daily. I’m not sure we are going down a completely 1984 route, it’s too complex a world to achieve as there are many who don’t want that also. Critical thinking is exhausting 😂

boston wine 2y ago

True that buying non kyc is not intuitive for those used to traditional investing. Absolutely

I agree with leaning toward optimism about the future, as well. After all, that’s kind of the point of Bitcoin and why it makes us all so hopeful/happy/positive about the world we’re creating for the next generations. It’s the first viable way to undo so much of the wrong that has been done!

Thanks for the discussion 🫂