Fair enough, but let’s be real: the core link between CO2 and warming is backed by decades of data. Debate the models or predictions, sure, but denying the basic mechanism is a stretch. What specific science are you questioning? Let’s dig into it.
nostr:nprofile1qqs0wgf8etnayvkcs4c636fdvepy73jc9q2xlcln64srjdm5e98p8ncpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0mfrppp Same same... except that the science is definitely up for debate.
Discussion
C02 correlations are not always accurate. Increases in C02 have not always had the effect climate activists have pointed to. The science is inconclusive.
Decades? No.
Climate change has hundreds of years of data to back it up, not decades.
The fucking predictions for warming caused by atmospheric CO2 are from the 1600s....