Replying to Avatar koby

Great question, thank you for asking! Probably deserves much more of a debate than a note but I’ll try.

I don’t think truth is achieved. I think truth just is truth. Our ability to comprehend the truth, understanding it fully, and accepting it as truth is certainly the biggest obstacle. This is why science and mathematics are so important.

Science is our attempt to find absolute truth, by always questioning, testing, observing, and coming as close to truth as possible. Mathematics is just a language with which we can measure and define what we observe in science. A communication medium that all scientific findings must adhere to. If you question a thesis, test it prove it using math. If you disagree, use math(logic).

If a majority of the people believe the Earth is flat, that doesn’t make it truth. What is great is we can test this. Your are not a conspiracy theorist for questioning, you are a scientist! Find ways to test if your thesis is true.

In regards to religion, how do you test which god is true, which is not? How can you believe things written about events thousands of years ago? How is this testable, observable? Is it all just faith? How can you test this on the God of the Bible?

A way I believe you can test this is by archeological finds. Did the things that the Bible, which is God’s inspired Word, happen or not? Can we find evidence of things written about? If we do find supporting evidence then these events may have transpired.

This is, of course, just 1 step/path you could use to find the truth.

If you were to come to the conclusion that the events in the Bible did happen, that they seem to be accurate, and I can find the Bible trustworthy as a historical document, then you might be able to ask deeper questions. If the Bible is accurate, then how does God, define itself/himself within the Bible? How does that impact or change my belief/understanding of what I or the collective think a god should or shouldn’t be.

🧡🧡🧡 sorry for making this a long note

The conclusion I found is that science and religious ideologies are an attempts to understand the nature of reality and “God” hence why I’m against following religion.

I believe our minds are insufficient at understanding the true nature of reality, all these ideologies are based upon human constructs, the Big Bang for example is just a theory as we cannot explain past a certain point, the universe is just too big for our minds to perceive, however I believe you can find understanding, meaning and “God” through your own understanding of what it means to you.

I think the collective idea of this could then spur a new movement in which the unconscious is made conscious, I think religion, science and other ideologies can somewhat make things cloudy.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We live in a world where bankruptcy of ideology is blatantly obvious, people do not look inward enough.

Appreciate the responses and engagement! Please keep the quality notes and replies up. ⚡️⚡️zapping

🤙🧡