So apparently it was just the Senate Banking Committee voting to make her the Chair of the Digital Assets Subcommittee.
My hope is that her BITCOIN Act doesn't turn into the SHITCOIN Act but I'm becoming more and more skeptical based on Trump's appointees and purchases.
It will :( turn into a shitcoin act
Yep, certainly trending that way with a quickness.
on the bright side, a lot of "if it's not endorsed by gubmint i won't invest" people are now gonna join the crypto-fiat scene and all the OG shitcoiners will stack their sats hard, of course, as they always do
which means that maybe we can shift the likely band of 200k bitcoin out to 500k at this point?
Is there a legal definition of Bitcoin which excludes all other crypto assets? Is that even possible?
That's what you should be asking yourself
Don't believe so. Also, in listening to folks like Eleanor Terrett and the guys from Satoshi Action Fund and Bitcoin Policy Institute over the last several years when talking about their advocation efforts, the Government views it as a wholistic asset class.
and of course they do, because most of the shitcoins were fomented by spook agencies from USA and 5 eyes
