I'm thinking along the lines of a customizable algorithm, I suppose. A personal trending list.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Exactly. But not one. Hundreds to choose from.

”I’m in the mood for uplifting happy stuff that I would like”

”give me hot discussions around my social circle”

Like an algo bazaar, yes. But I'd want to combine them, into one glorious, personalized feed. 😂

YES! I added this to the DVM spec because I had this exact same thing in mind: the output of an algorithm is the input of another one

Hmmmm 🤔 I like where this is going! #yestr

Ah, very nice. Nested algos. Clean.

show me what I want v show me what u want

But the base algorithm can also be improved, I think. It's a bit too "dumb".

There is no “base” algorithm though; just too few implementations that everybody uses because they don’t realize there’s better stuff available.

What we need to work on is disintermediating that conception where everybody integrates with one or two different algorithms just because

Oh, I agree, but nostr:nprofile1qyvhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnndehhyapwwdhkx6tpdshszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qgnwaehxw309ahkvenrdpskjm3wwp6kytcqyqe4dhnpkwty0ycuazepgzet4wphuzqscrh4zka7jt0qyjqypw9a6vxwe7g was challenging us to improve his specifically.

Then we'd at least have two very different result outputs. The ones we have (band/primal) are so similar in the output, that I mistakingly thought that one was perhaps a fork of the other.

To be honest, it's embarrassingly easy to game the current trending lists, if you are good at pattern-recognition.

If I want something unusual, but interesting, to trend, I just write "GM" or "GN" after the text and then the GM/GN replies push it up the list. 😂