with regards to this guy, according to this actions in the last 10 years: he was 'tweeting' for many years, had subpoenas in front of congress, spoke about twitter and other things, there is enough material in order to judge him in a fair way. i do not buy that he suddenly endorses free speech. what you write does not make any sense. you assume and accuse.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.