1) the “speed of science” is still a crime (some of the flccc did this, but it’s not the same as a mass “vaccine” rollout, for a few reasons)

2) a mass rollout is skipping the question of who really needs this product (answer is no one, but rhetorically, were this conducted in good faith), if it were only a small number of people we wouldn’t have needed this

3) informed consent by definition was impossible because of the bait and switch

4) the epidemiological underpinnings of this were completely insane, taking Covid as “detected” by high cycle pcr, switching from flatten the curve to stamp it out, assuming people could spread it asymptomatically and that the “vaccine” would solve this

5) censorship of scientists is not science, nor the advice to “follow” science. Maybe when it’s something that doesn’t directly affect your life, but absolutely not epidemiology