Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar hh

There is no intersection between BTC and the economics of Marxism.

Marx's labor theory of value is the most absurd, ridiculous and laughable piece ever written. It's literal nonsense. Most importantly, Marx's understanding of human incentives and motives is completely wrong. A fantasy without roots in reality.

Anyone who in this day and age bases his understanding of political economics on Marx's theory is simply intellectually dishonest, or stupid.

If you want to desperately grasp at straws to be edgy and try to somehow mix Marx and BTC, you can appeal to the mythical stateless society to come after the struggle of the revolution and the dictatorship of the proletariat.

And even then, the overlap with market anarchism continues to be the most natural one.

That's not "right wing" by the way, just like "Austrian" economics is not "Austrian". It's just economics without adjectives.

Avatar
hh 2y ago

Still grasping at straws I see.

The "transmission of individual enhancements of private value" is not "communism", and it doesn't matter how much you contort language and definitions, it has nothing to do with marxism.

The mechanism by which this is achieved is simple and well known - market and voluntarism. When you have these, the aggregation of individual positives is not a zero sum, as it is in communism.

Your maths and "data" are useless in a purely moral and social field like economics.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.