Replying to Avatar BTCrevolutionary

To achieve $100 trillion USD in liquidity for the Bitcoin Lightning Network—equivalent to the estimated global M2 money supply—would require an extraordinary amount of Bitcoin (BTC) locked in payment channels, given Bitcoin’s fixed supply cap of 21 million BTC. Below, I’ll calculate the BTC needed assuming a Bitcoin price of $1 million (as used in the previous response), analyze the technical and practical requirements, and discuss the feasibility of reaching this scale.

### Step 1: Calculating BTC Needed for $100 Trillion in Liquidity

- **Target Liquidity**: $100 trillion USD ($100,000,000,000,000), representing the global M2 money supply.

- **Bitcoin Price**: $1,000,000 per BTC (consistent with the prior calculation).

- **BTC Required**:

\[

\text{BTC needed} = \frac{\text{USD value}}{\text{BTC price}} = \frac{100,000,000,000,000}{1,000,000} = 100,000,000 \, \text{BTC}

\]

- **Bitcoin’s Supply Cap**: Bitcoin’s maximum supply is 21 million BTC, with ~19.5 million BTC in circulation as of 2025 (accounting for mined coins and losses). Needing 100 million BTC is **impossible** because it’s ~4.76x Bitcoin’s total supply (100M / 21M ≈ 4.76).

### Step 2: Adjusting for Realistic Bitcoin Price

Since 100 million BTC is unattainable, let’s explore what Bitcoin price would be required to achieve $100 trillion in liquidity with the available supply:

- **Maximum Available BTC**: Assume all 21 million BTC were locked in Lightning channels (unrealistic, as some BTC is lost, held, or used elsewhere, but useful for calculation).

- **Required BTC Price**:

\[

\text{BTC price} = \frac{\text{USD value}}{\text{BTC supply}} = \frac{100,000,000,000,000}{21,000,000} \approx 4,761,904.76 \, \text{USD per BTC}

\]

Thus, a Bitcoin price of ~$4.76 million per BTC would be needed to achieve $100 trillion in liquidity using the entire 21 million BTC supply.

- **Using Circulating Supply**: With ~19.5 million BTC in circulation (accounting for lost coins):

\[

\text{BTC price} = \frac{100,000,000,000,000}{19,500,000} \approx 5,128,205.13 \, \text{USD per BTC}

\]

This requires a Bitcoin price of ~$5.13 million per BTC.

### Step 3: Implications of the Calculation

- **Price Feasibility**: A Bitcoin price of $4.76M–$5.13M per BTC is a ~80–85x increase from $60,000 (a plausible 2025 price) or ~5x from $1M (the prior assumption). Such a price assumes unprecedented adoption, institutional investment, or speculative mania, which introduces economic risks (e.g., volatility, accessibility).

- **Supply Constraints**: Even at $5M/BTC, dedicating the entire Bitcoin supply to Lightning channels is unrealistic. Bitcoin serves multiple purposes (e.g., store of value, on-chain transactions, other layer-2 solutions), so only a fraction (e.g., 10–20%) might be available for Lightning, requiring an even higher price:

- If 10% of 19.5M BTC (1.95M BTC) is used:

\[

\text{BTC price} = \frac{100,000,000,000,000}{1,950,000} \approx 51,282,051.28 \, \text{USD per BTC}

\]

This implies a ~$51.3M/BTC price, which is highly speculative.

### Step 4: Technical Requirements for $100 Trillion Liquidity

To support $100 trillion in Lightning Network liquidity, even at a high BTC price, several technical challenges must be addressed:

- **Channel Capacity**:

- At $5M/BTC, 19.5M BTC provides $100T in liquidity. If each channel holds 0.01 BTC ($50,000 at $5M/BTC) for consumer transactions, this supports:

\[

\frac{19,500,000}{0.01} = 1,950,000,000 \, \text{channels}

\]

This could serve ~2 billion users with one channel each, covering ~25% of the global population (8 billion). Supporting all 8 billion users would require shared channels or hubs.

- **On-Chain Transactions**:

- Opening 1.95 billion channels requires on-chain Bitcoin transactions, constrained by Bitcoin’s block size (~1 MB, ~2,000–3,000 transactions per block) and block time (~10 minutes). At ~50,000 blocks per year (~5M transactions), opening 1.95B channels would take:

\[

\frac{1,950,000,000}{5,000,000} \approx 390 \, \text{years}

\]

This is infeasible without optimizations.

- **Solution**: **Channel factories** allow multiple channels to be opened with one on-chain transaction. For example, a factory creating 100 channels per transaction reduces the requirement to ~19.5M transactions (~4 years at 5M tx/year), still challenging but more manageable.

- **Routing**:

- A network with billions of channels requires efficient routing algorithms to find paths with sufficient liquidity. At $5M/BTC, each channel holds more value (e.g., 0.01 BTC = $50,000), easing routing for larger payments but requiring robust pathfinding for a global network.

- **Solutions**: Trampoline payments, Rendezvous routing, and Atomic Multi-Path Payments (AMP) can optimize routing. Machine learning or probabilistic routing could further scale pathfinding.

- **Liquidity Management**:

- Distributing $100T across channels requires dynamic liquidity allocation. For example, hubs serving millions of users need millions of BTC, while individual users need only 0.01–0.1 BTC.

- **Solutions**: Liquidity marketplaces (e.g., Lightning Pool), automated rebalancing (e.g., Loop), and multi-party channels can optimize liquidity. AMP allows large payments to be split across multiple paths, reducing per-channel requirements.

- **Node Infrastructure**:

- Supporting billions of users requires millions of nodes (current: ~18,000). Lightweight nodes (e.g., Neutrino-based wallets) and mobile-friendly solutions (e.g., Phoenix) are essential for accessibility, especially in regions with limited internet.

- **Challenge**: Nodes must be online to route payments, requiring reliable global internet infrastructure.

- **Privacy and Security**:

- A massive network increases risks of malicious nodes, denial-of-service attacks, or privacy leaks. Onion routing and Taproot/Schnorr signatures enhance privacy, but scaling to billions of channels requires robust monitoring (e.g., watchtowers).

### Step 5: Practical Feasibility

Achieving $100 trillion in Lightning liquidity is extremely challenging:

- **Bitcoin Supply**: Even at $5M/BTC, the entire circulating supply (19.5M BTC) is needed, leaving no BTC for other uses. A more realistic scenario (e.g., 10% of supply) requires a ~$50M/BTC price, which is speculative and economically disruptive.

- **Current Capacity**: The Lightning Network’s current capacity is ~5,000–6,000 BTC (~$30–36T at $5M/BTC). Reaching $100T requires a ~2,800–3,300x increase in locked BTC, necessitating massive adoption and infrastructure growth.

- **Adoption**: Supporting global M2-scale liquidity requires near-universal adoption by merchants, consumers, and institutions. User-friendly wallets and merchant integration (e.g., via Strike or Cash App) are improving but far from global scale.

- **Velocity of Money**: $100T in liquidity could support far more than $100T in annual transactions if money circulates frequently. For example, a velocity of 10 (each BTC used 10 times/year) could facilitate $1,000T in transactions, but this assumes hyper-efficient channel usage.

### Step 6: Economic and Social Considerations

- **Price Volatility**: A $5M/BTC price implies a market cap of ~$97.5T (19.5M × $5M), comparable to global M2, making Bitcoin a dominant global asset. This could reduce liquidity for other assets but also make BTC less accessible for new users.

- **Centralization Risks**: Large hubs (e.g., exchanges, payment processors) might dominate liquidity to manage $100T, risking centralization. Decentralized solutions like multi-party channels are critical.

- **Regulatory Hurdles**: Governments may resist a system handling $100T due to concerns over tax evasion, money laundering, or financial control, potentially limiting adoption.

### Step 7: Alternative Scenarios

Since $100T in liquidity is unrealistic with Bitcoin’s supply, consider:

- **Partial Coverage**: Targeting 10% of M2 ($10T) requires 2M BTC at $5M/BTC (~10% of supply), more feasible but still requiring significant growth.

- **Higher Velocity**: Increasing transaction velocity (e.g., 100x/year) reduces liquidity needs. For example, 1M BTC at $5M/BTC ($5T liquidity) could support $500T in transactions with high velocity.

- **Layered Solutions**: Combining Lightning with sidechains (e.g., Liquid) or other layer-2/3 protocols could offload liquidity demands, though these introduce trade-offs (e.g., trust assumptions).

### Conclusion

Achieving $100 trillion in Lightning Network liquidity is technically infeasible with Bitcoin’s 21 million BTC cap unless the price reaches ~$4.76M–$5.13M/BTC (using the full or circulating supply). Even then, it requires dedicating nearly all BTC to Lightning, which is impractical due to competing uses. Technical solutions like channel factories, AMP, and liquidity marketplaces can reduce the BTC needed per channel, but scaling to $100T demands billions of channels, millions of nodes, and global adoption. At current capacity (5,000–6,000 BTC), reaching $100T at $5M/BTC requires a ~2,800–3,300x increase, a long-term goal. More realistic targets (e.g., $1T–$10T) are achievable with innovations and a high BTC price, but $100T is likely beyond Lightning’s practical reach without fundamental changes to Bitcoin’s ecosystem.

If you want to explore specific solutions (e.g., channel factories, velocity optimization) or adjust for different BTC prices or liquidity targets, let me know!

Interesting.

Maybe push the extreme. Half of circulating supply. Push max fiat value. I bet the price per coin is close to $50-100m a coin

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is math out put forth by grok 🤷

grok is a bigot

Grok

"Let’s dive into this intriguing scenario where half of Bitcoin’s circulating supply, utilized on the Lightning Network, becomes the backbone of a global monetary system facilitating payments equivalent to the global M2 money supply. We’ll tackle the three parts of the query systematically: assessing feasibility, calculating the cost per Bitcoin, and determining the cost per Satoshi.

### a) Feasibility

The Lightning Network is a layer-2 scaling solution for Bitcoin, designed to enable fast, low-cost transactions off-chain while leveraging Bitcoin’s security. The idea here is that half of Bitcoin’s circulating supply powers this network to handle global payments matching the M2 money supply—a broad measure encompassing cash, checking deposits, and near-money worldwide. But is this plausible?

- **Scalability**: The Lightning Network can theoretically process a vast number of transactions per second, far exceeding Bitcoin’s base layer. However, it’s still developing. Supporting a global payment system would demand robust infrastructure—thousands of well-funded nodes and channels—to manage worldwide transaction volume without bottlenecks.

- **Adoption**: For this vision to materialize, individuals, businesses, and governments globally would need to embrace the Lightning Network. This requires a monumental shift from traditional financial systems, facing resistance from entrenched institutions and necessitating widespread education and trust in a decentralized system.

- **Regulatory Hurdles**: Governments might view a Bitcoin-based global network as a threat to monetary sovereignty. Regulatory pushback, restrictions, or outright bans could stifle adoption, especially in major economies.

- **Technical Challenges**: Issues like channel liquidity (ensuring enough BTC is available in channels), efficient routing across a massive network, and maintaining security at scale remain unresolved. While progress is ongoing, these hurdles are significant.

Given these factors, the feasibility in the near term is **low**. The Lightning Network holds promise, but achieving global dominance for payments requires overcoming substantial technological, social, and political barriers. It’s a long-term possibility, not an imminent reality.

### b) Cost per Bitcoin

Now, let’s estimate the cost per Bitcoin in this hypothetical world. The scenario posits that half of Bitcoin’s circulating supply, via the Lightning Network, facilitates payments equal to the global M2 money supply. We’ll need some figures and assumptions to crunch the numbers.

- **Circulating Supply of BTC**: As of July 2025 (a reasonable projection point), Bitcoin’s circulating supply is approximately 19.89 million BTC, accounting for mined coins minus those lost or dormant.

- **Global M2 Money Supply**: The global M2, summing M2 figures across countries, is around $120 trillion USD in mid-2025, based on economic trends and data up to that point.

- **Scenario Interpretation**: Half the circulating supply—about 9.945 million BTC—is “on the Lightning Network,” supporting payments worth $120 trillion. In the Lightning Network, BTC is locked in channels, but the total value of payments can exceed the locked amount due to rapid, repeated off-chain transactions. However, the query equates these payments to the global M2, suggesting a valuation link.

To proceed, let’s assume that if the Lightning Network becomes the global monetary system, Bitcoin’s total market capitalization reflects the economic activity it underpins—here, the $120 trillion in payments. This is speculative but aligns with how currencies are valued based on the economies they support. If all 19.89 million BTC underpin this system (even if only half is actively locked at any time), the market might price the entire supply accordingly.

**Calculation**:

- Total market cap of BTC = Global M2 = $120,000,000,000,000

- Circulating supply = 19,890,000 BTC

- Price per BTC = $120,000,000,000,000 ÷ 19,890,000 ≈ $6,033,000

Rounding for clarity, the cost per Bitcoin would be approximately **$6,030,000**. This assumes the market values Bitcoin’s total supply as equivalent to the global M2, a simplification given the Lightning Network’s dynamics, but fitting for this thought experiment.

### c) Cost per Satoshi

A Satoshi is Bitcoin’s smallest unit, where 1 BTC = 100,000,000 Satoshis. With the price per Bitcoin established, calculating the cost per Satoshi is straightforward.

**Calculation**:

- Price per BTC = $6,030,000

- Price per Satoshi = $6,030,000 ÷ 100,000,000 = $0.0603

Thus, each Satoshi would be worth approximately **$0.0603**, or **6.03 cents**. This makes sense in a world where Bitcoin’s value has soared to represent global M2, elevating even its tiniest fraction.

### Final Thoughts

These calculations hinge on the assumption that Bitcoin’s market cap matches the $120 trillion M2, reflecting its role as the global payment backbone. Real-world factors—velocity of money, partial adoption, or alternative valuation models—could adjust this, but the scenario’s framing supports this approach. The results are staggering: a Bitcoin at $6.03 million and a Satoshi at 6 cents paint a picture of a radically transformed financial landscape.

So, to summarize:

- **a)** The feasibility is low due to scalability, adoption, regulatory, and technical challenges.

- **b)** The cost per Bitcoin would be approximately $6,030,000.

- **c)** The cost per Satoshi would be approximately $0.0603."