Replying to Avatar Cyph3rp9nk

Interesting facts from someone who has dedicated much of their life to the administration and design of large systems.

The most widely used Linux distribution on servers is Ubuntu, because it has been able to move into the cloud and most providers offer it.

Ubuntu is a very good distribution for system administrators. It is essentially Debian with certified support for servers and a defined life cycle. Unlike Debian, we know when the LTS versions of Ubuntu will be released and can plan accordingly.

Many Linux distributions are less secure than Windows 11 by default, as they come without a firewall enabled by default, without AppArmor or SELinux, secure boot, etc. Always use distributions that come hardened by default, such as Ubuntu, Fedora, RHEL, Debian, or openSUSE.

If you want something that doesn't break, use Fedora Silverblue.

AIX is simply great; it's the operating system every sysadmin dreams of. Everything is perfectly documented through error codes. Its LVM was advanced for its time, with software RAID, snapshots, quorum, and distributed metadata, etc., and together with OpenBSD, it is one of the most secure systems in existence. Unfortunately, it only runs on IBM Power machines.

Solaris, another great system, especially with the arrival of ZFS, was a shame when it was acquired by Oracle. Solaris was a cutting-edge OS in every way.

With FreeBSD, I have hosted thousands of web servers and petabytes of information with ZFS. What can I say about this great, pure, hard UNIX? I will always carry it in my heart.

And finally, System Z and its z/OS (among others), unbreakable, can run at 99% capacity continuously and you won't notice any delay. You can run applications from 40 years ago; the backward compatibility is simply incredible. The security of OpenBSD next to z/OS is a joke. And like all IBM mainframe products, the documentation is simply spectacular.

As you can see, I have a fondness for mainframes. In this sense, Linux was a big step backward for large system administrators, as the documentation is often terrible, errors are continuous and often difficult to fix, especially in distributed systems. In exchange, the costs are lower, but the headaches are greater 😂 .

No Arch? Even with LUKS and LVM?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Arch does not come with SELinux, secure boot, or a firewall by default, so I cannot recommend it to a novice.

And for an expert, you're going to waste your time activating these things. My philosophy is not to waste time on things that have long since been solved; it's not productive.

It's been a few years since I last used a distro. Is SELinux a new thing? I hadn't heard about it before.

It was developed by the NSA and launched in 2000, officially adopted by the Linux kernel in 2003, and even today there are still distributions that do not use it or, failing that, the alternative, which is apparmor.

What's your personal Linux distro of choice for a regular desktop setup? My main uses are web browsing, light productivity (LibreOffice, GIMP), and Bitcoin software like Sparrow Wallet.

My daily distribution is Fedora Silverblue, but it's not for everyone, especially beginners, because you have to understand how it works.

The reason I use it is because it's unbreakable, and if it breaks, you can revert it in a second.

If you're not willing to use Fedora Silverblue, I'm more in favor of Ubuntu/Debian since I don't really like rpm distributions, but that's a personal preference.

Between Ubuntu and Debian, I would choose Ubuntu because it has newer software.

Thank you! Silverblue sounds interesting. I will definitely check this out.

Yes, I like Debian too. I believe last distro I used was Debian Buster I believe it was, with backports or flatpak apps.

Fair enough.. But the speed of not having bloating apps.. It's fantastic.

I run both Arch on my tablet and Mint on my desktop.. It's going alright. Thinking to ditch Mint for something else, not sure I wanna do Arch in both, so I'm interested to see what's out there.