https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animals_aboard_the_Titanic
i simply do not trust this article in its entirety
i am engaging with it like it is a pleasant fiction math problem and writing prompt
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animals_aboard_the_Titanic
i simply do not trust this article in its entirety
i am engaging with it like it is a pleasant fiction math problem and writing prompt
if i do not trust this article that means what
i dont trust wikipedia, i dont trust the editors of wikipedia although i do trust one editor from wikipedia cos i followed her on twitter for awhile, molly
so if i dont trust wikipedia and i only trust one editor
that's ok cos i can start to verify this article with primary sources
however, who would write this article if it was 'not real' and why
cos that's weird too
who would write a 'fake' article for who
cos if it was for me
that is
idk what that is
am i supposed to thank someone or fight someone like what
fight someone on the grounds of:
why are we putting fake stuff on wikipedia
not fight fight
word fight
who on earth cares about the pets on the titanic
and why is the article written way less dry
it isnt in wikipedia voice
on balance of scales
and i dont mean this in a whatever way
i just mean actual
there is simply no way that someone wrote a fake article on wikipedia for me specifically
no one cares about me that much
so that option is out
it is not that.
it is something else
why is this article psycho

no smithsonian magazine
i cant imagine that cos that is weird as fuck to imagine
no one should ever imagine dying for anyone's dog
the fuck is wrong with the author?