Paying attention to the natural world leads to some interesting insights.

One of the main realizations I’ve had is that organisms lack compassion and empathy in the natural world.

People have empathy but if the spider was bigger than the human and you were caught in its web that thing would crawl over and inject the ensnared with a neurotoxin that would liquify its organs and then suck out the contents as they died a horrific and painful death. Absolutely no compassion or concern with the agony.

Birds eat other bird’s hatchlings alive. Otters rape baby seals to death. Predators kill the young and weak of their prey and tear them apart while they’re still alive. Male bears kill cubs to “mate” with the mother. The shit that happens in nature is extreme and horrifying. But is it what the universe intends?

I think a case can be made why compassion and empathy are heretical to the longstanding laws of the natural world. Are these emotions a weakness? A mistake? Or something positive emerging from higher order intelligence that many other creatures just can’t access?

I see lack of compassion and empathy in a lot of individuals who are otherwise considered quite successful in human societies. Makes me wonder if the universe tends to reward adherence to natural law…

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You are applying principles across kingdoms.

There are levels of being, or kingdoms, with each level acquiring more/greater/deeper powers- for example, compassion & empathy.

Rudolf Steiner writes about this if interested...

That is interesting though it seems “levels” across kingdoms is a bit arbitrary and not necessarily consistent. Dolphins are certainly at the highest level other than human and are known to be extremely cruel and savage.

Great observations that I have also pondered. The following excerpt is from "My Philosophy of Liberty":

"This short-term benefit is not only dangerous to the thief but it is detrimental to his long-term well-being as well. This is because his victims must divert a portion of their resources toward protection services instead of toward production. This loss of production reduces the overall societal standard of living as there are less products and services available for trade.

"Nevertheless, the thief is not concerned with the detrimental, long-term effects of plunder as he only cares about the immediate benefit. Therefore, the rest of society must take protective measures if they wish to safeguard their life, liberty and property. It follows then that the degree of man’s freedom can be enhanced by the level of protection that he has secured."

Source:

https://stevenminnaar.com/my-philosophy-of-liberty

Good stuff. Thank you.