From beginning to end. Pointless to watch. Same bullshit maxitards pull everywhere. He compares the marketcap to that of a snacks company. We're not discussing price action monero side, only real use cases. Darknet markets, ransomware gangs, botnets; the fringes. Where it all started, not NGU circlejerking a la carte.
Rubbish.
Would not lightning fall into the same or better privacy and security as Monero?
Not really... Plus, you are comparing an L2 with a mainnet (onchain) tool. So, L2 vs. L1. Monero obfuscates amounts, sender and recipient, by default, no opt-in. LN helps sender's privacy, recipient not so much, or backwards, can't remember exactly.
LN is mostly used custodially with ZERO privacy and ZERO agency over ones funds.
It's zE FutURE.
Indeed, Monero much more complete privacy package in one layer. I find that things that follows nature more closely, usually sticks around longer and represents a more complete picture of reality. So dividing features into layers makes more sense. It allows for a more robust system for progressing in features, fixing bugs, etc. But I understand that Monero has more to do with those who are focused on privacy, while Bitcoin is focused on preservation of value.
