Source needs verifying.
๐๐ผ๐ ๐๐ถ๐น๐น ๐ฆ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐๐ต๐ถ ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป?
And how can ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ join in the training and stack sats?
Find out in this excellent article by Gareth Jenkinson from nostr:npub1an2zvj6a6q76sgmqd7q8xurj90tx4hzegdmqg29qj4slukx9gywssx6vfc
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-based-ai-language-model-aims-to-drive-education
Discussion
What do you mean? The article quotes Aleks Svetski and explains all about the Spirit of Satoshi. The Spirit of Satoshi account even shared this, so what does the source need to verify? ๐คจ
Cointelegraph. Skeptical sourcing. Lots of bad news out of there lately. And by that I mean they were the ones that did the whole ETF false news and so in mainly just trolling because of that but didnโt make that apparent so now it looks like Iโm serious and Iโm starting to reconsider my life choices of shit posting on The NOSTR as a career option.
I wouldn't trust cointelegraph with telling me what the weather is outside. What a bunch of ๐คก๐คก๐คก
LOL! No worries. Thanks for explaining all that. I was just confused, but yeah, you make a good point regarding CoinTelegraph.
This is a good article about Spirit of Satoshi, though. And you know what they say: "A broken clock is right twice a day." ๐
Iโm a big fan of the project. Admittedly havenโt sat down with it in any meaningful way though. Would be dope to package it for StartOS or something.