That would mean many balloons launched world wide and coming down somewhere. After decades of this, wouldn’t some see these coming down? They can’t all land in the ocean.
Satellites work in harmony with ground-based towers and undersea cables, but they might not be what you expect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RMTTeWVlTk
NASA is also the biggest buyer of helium.
Discussion
The guy who lays the undersea cables in the first video says 95% of all telephone and data is transferred over submarine cables.
My uneducated guess is that it's probably closer to 99%.
I don't remember where I saw this - but I remember seeing that the vast majority of satellite-balloons are launched in Antarctica.
There's this thing called the The Antarctic Treaty signed by over 50 nations, forbidding anyone to freely explore Antarctica.
To understand how this would work though, you would have to use the Flat Earth map and not the spinning ball with water stuck to it, with the people in Australia being upside down.
Two well-made documentaries are:
https://rumble.com/v4ofj20-what-on-earth-happend-13-part-full-doc-aewaranon-lhfe.html
https://rumble.com/v2djm9c-the-lost-history-of-flat-earth-full-series.html
Thanks.
There is intrigue around Antarctica, I have run across that treaty in past travels. The Germans were exploring it during ww2, and then US shortly after. The visits by ‘high level officials’ recently is puzzling, what’s so interesting about it compared with the North arctic area?
The Antarctic wall is the edge of our known world on a flat Earth map, which is also the UN logo.
The last man to explore Antarctica before the Antarctic treaty was admiral E. Byrd who said it was an untouched reservoir of natural resources.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJJbc81OJcU
But to answer your question more directly, what do all these 50 countries who signed the treaty have in common?
They want to control and enslave their populations.
As a slave master if you had the ability to give your people free and endless energy, would you do it - obviously you're not incentivized to - you'd want your people to have the least free time possible, so they can't figure out how badly you're fucking them up the ass.
You need a nation of workers, not a nation of thinkers.
If food, water, energy and land is practically free and abundant, you're gonna have a tough time as a dictator.
Bitcoin broke this enslavement system, but most people don't know this yet.
Interesting, my concept of a spherical Earth is being tested.
You’re right regarding rulers mot wanting critical thinkers. Just people being able to think enough to serve their master’s needs and desires.
Free energy, no way. Maybe one would burn down Tesla’s lab which held all of this work on free energy for the world and those power transmitting towers. I mean if energy can be beamed around in the form of cell signals, why not on a larger scale?
A ruler might also add fluoride to the drinking water, to reduce cognitive capabilities in the masses. Maybe even get them hooked on TV and other memorizing electronic devices.
Damn, I’m using one right now lol.
*Mesmorizing devices.
Well if you still believe the Earth is a spinning ball, you have some research to do.
You can either believe your eyes and your senses or you can believe in scientism priests.
Nothing will make sense until you start asking questions.
Until then, the Earth seems like it's flat, but it's actually a ball.
It seems like it's stationary, but it's actually spinning with thousands of miles per hour.
It seems like you can't get water to stick to a ball, but you actually can.
The people in Australia seem perfectly normal, but they're actually upside down.
It's just gravity and meanwhile gravity doesn't work on helium balloons somehow.
Doing this kind of research is a personal choice of course, for some people it's much better to just stick with the official narrative - life is simpler that way.
I worked as a broadcast engineer for decades. When we calculate the amount of power and antenna height needed to send a signal of a certain strength to a certain location, the curvature of the Earth has to be taken into account. If the Earth were flat, then the signal dropoff with distance would perfectly follow the inverse square law (which states that field strength diminishes by 6 dB every time you double the distance from the antenna). But it doesn't follow the inverse square law. If it did, you could pick up FM stations from New York City in Lisbon with perfect clarity. When the curvature of the Earth, based on its sphericity, is included in the equations, then field strength predictions are accurate.
Thank you very much for this clarity and validation. It’s been a while since I took physics, but I understand the inverse square law (used in light calcs as well). This makes perfect sense.
I’m also reminded of the math in GPS calculations, and triangulation. Which also proves curvature of the earth by taking into account satellite positions relative to the receiver on the ground. This includes geometric dilution of precision, if I’m not mistaken.
Not hating, just curious… Why would the earth be flat? Did god create it that way? Or did it naturally occur? Is there any evidence of other flat planets/worlds? As per your diagram, why can’t Australia see the sun during the night? How does gravity work?
On Evolution - a logical analysis:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UnRC7_dC7U
Or you can watch the documentary directly:
https://rumble.com/voa4wo-evolution-vs.-god-full-movie.html
On why the Earth would be flat - 2 documentaries:
https://rumble.com/v4ofj20-what-on-earth-happend-13-part-full-doc-aewaranon-lhfe.html
https://rumble.com/v2djm9c-the-lost-history-of-flat-earth-full-series.html
They answer all your questions.