The first chart shows the human world population in the last 12.000 years. That's about when the last glacial period (commonly misnomered as "ice age") ended. Since then, Earth had a very stable climate until about 150 years ago, which made agriculture and hence large civilizations possible.
The map shows the density of the human population today (darker red means more dense).
Half of these people are Chinese and Indian.
A lot of fucking, like a lot
Goes from mentioning the last ice age (which we are still technically in as there is ice at both poles) to claiming that the Earth had a very stable climate until about 150 years ago. conveniently leaving out the Roman warm period (where they were growing wine grapes as far north as Hadrian's wall in Britain) and the later medieval warm period which was quickly followed by the little ice age which had the Thames in London icing over for months at a time in the 18th Century. Earth's Climate is neither stable or consistent over longer periods of time and we need to stop scaring ourselves silly about our population going up once we had learnt how to better grow food and resources. We are at the edge of launching our civilisation to the stars and yet the Globalists want us to start eating bugs and living impoverished lives "for the sake of the planet!"
That was not the point why I posted this, but thanks for the comment anyway.
The colder and warmer periods of the last millenia where smaller fluctuations compared to so-called greenhouse Earths, since we are still in a so-called icehouse Earth. In the last warm period of this kind, humans didn't exist.
Personally, I believe that the human population on Earth will stabilize at about 10 billion.
whERE does BC land On this 🙃 BC>
You could see its impact in those countries that are comparatively wealthy. In those the birth rates sank to about or below replacement numbers. Which is one reason why I believe, that population numbers will stabilize over time.
