I wrote a longish thing about this a while back:

The words individuals think and use are a product of their linguistic environment, which shapes the way they perceive and express their thoughts.

In this context, the argument can be made that language, while enabling communication and expression, is itself a form of programming. The words and phrases people learn and use are a result of their exposure to a particular language and culture. As such, language can both enable and constrain free will. Here's a more nuanced exploration:

Linguistic Constraints: Language provides a framework for expressing thoughts and desires, but it also imposes constraints. The vocabulary and grammar of a language limit the precision and scope of expression. Certain thoughts or concepts may be challenging to articulate within the constraints of a particular language.

Influence of Language on Thought: The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that language influences thought. The words available in one's language can affect the way they think about and perceive the world. In this sense, language can shape thought patterns and, to some extent, limit the range of free will.

Linguistic Freedom: While language is a product of societal programming, it also offers a degree of linguistic freedom. Individuals can adapt and manipulate language to express unique and nuanced ideas. They can coin new terms, use metaphors, and employ rhetoric to convey their thoughts and emotions in creative ways.

Individual Agency: Despite the influence of language, individuals possess agency in their language use. They can choose to conform to societal norms or challenge them. They can engage in discourse and debate, using language as a tool to express their perspectives and advocate for their desires.

In summary, language represents a complex interplay between societal programming and individual agency. While it is shaped by culture and community, it can also be harnessed as a tool for expressing free will. The extent to which language enables or constrains free will remains a subject of ongoing debate and examination.