Replying to Avatar Stella Assange

Julian Assange explains the 2025 USAID debacle, eleven years ago:

‘The received wisdom in advanced capitalist societies is that there still exists an organic “civil society sector” in which institutions form autonomously and come together to manifest the interests and will of citizens. The fable has it that the boundaries of this sector are respected by actors from government and the “private sector,” leaving a safe space for NGOs and nonprofits to advocate for things like human rights, free speech, and accountable government.

This sounds like a great idea. But if it was ever true, it has not been for decades.

Since at least the 1970s, authentic actors like unions and churches have folded under a sustained assault by free-market statism, transforming "civil society" into a buyer's market for political factions and corporate interests looking to exert influence at arm's length. The last forty years have seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.

It is not just obvious neocon front groups like Foreign Policy Initiative. It also includes fatuous Western NGOs like Freedom House, where naïve but well-meaning career nonprofit workers are twisted in knots by political funding streams, denouncing non-Western human rights violations while keeping local abuses firmly in their blind spots.

The civil society conference circuit—which flies developing-world activists across the globe hundreds of times a year to bless the unholy union between "government and private stakeholders" at geopoliticized events like the "Stockholm Internet Forum"—simply could not exist if it were not blasted with millions of dollars in political funding annually…’

Text from Sep 2014, before he was imprisoned in Belmarsh. Extracted from his book, “When Google Met WikiLeaks”. Full text and images for the first chapter are available for free here:

https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/

A lot of well-meaning, talented people who could genuinely transform society get trapped in the NGO circus circuit, their revolutionary energy slowly redirected into bureaucracy. The civil society is structured not to amplify dissent, but to absorb and neutralize it before it ever becomes effective . The best way to control opposition isn’t to crush it it’s to fund it, professionalize it, and make it part of the system

USAID perfected the game , by picking every movement under the sun even if it’s some ridiculous movement like giving trans kids around the world access to pet chickens , or causes that are directly against US national security and against the personal interest of the Soros type funding it , it doesn’t matter . Because down the line, no matter what the movement originally stood for, it can be steered, diluted, or repurposed to serve a different agenda.

One moment, they’re advocating for gender equality in some country, and before they know it, they’re involved in an armed movement to overthrow their own government, completely unaware of how they got there.

One moment, they’re standing up for woman rights, and the next, they’re in the middle of a staged provocation with some conveniently timed police crackdown that gets blasted all over international media, causing just the right amount of outrage to justify a U.S.-backed intervention.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.