His ideology is pretty close to that of the founders, if a little too friendly to the "2nd Constitution" of 1964. Also has some blind spots in economics, to be sure. But he is absolutely on point in decoding the tactics and terminology of these enemies of Western Civilization, and for that reason I wholeheartedly recommend people give him a close read/listen.
Discussion
Yes he is “too patriotic” in a way that he can’t understand that the US is itself a problem now, not the solution. He’s massively opposed to national divorce because he thinks that’s driven by leftists when in reality it’s the solution for those he would align with to actually regain their freedoms and do away with the shit ideology that he does such a good job of identifying and dissecting. That’s why I say he treats the symptoms - he doesn’t have the courage to get to the root and thinks the system can be salvaged with the right people in charge which is just naive.
I can't disagree. He recently quoted Spooner disparagingly and I was sorely disappointed. But look at the company he keeps. It's mostly good, but still off in some ways.