Very much the reason we're on Nostr. I wonder though was this every in doubt, were it the opposite direction it would suggest the user would have to reach a little further for no net benefit. Obviously open to explanations as to why under rather than over might be optimal. Indeed perhaps it is possible to patent the alternative direction?

“I want to reach further for something I need,” said no rational person ever

The other way is for cat owners

Also, I’m going to take a moment to appreciate how much better our toilet paper is today than what they must have had in 1891. Ouch.