Movement was _not_ more fluid. Most people never left their region and borders weren't heavily policed in peacetime because there was mostly movement from one side to the other.
You didn't have Chinese and Syrian people entering over Mexico.
Standardized traveling papers are an innovation that allow us to travel globally, knowing that we will be accepted on the other end.
"Passports" were issued at war times so you could visit your family members across battle front. There was no such thing as a permit to enter a territory. There were only permits to leave (because you were a proprty).
No one is concerned about movement, this isn’t movement going on. It’s deliberate flooding to collapse America and Europe to a Globalist agenda of total control through the breakdown of identity.
It's hard for people to imagine there are agendas and people with the resources to carry them out.
Is it though? Think about it.
Sure it is. Most people don't want to believe that there is an elite power structure trying to push society in a particular direction for its own gain. The question of cross-border movement is a good example.
If a cabal wanted to collapse a country, creating a scenario where millions of people are actively encouraged to cross a border must be considered. Then you have to get beyond the local reasons for migration and ask what interest the cabal has in the movement.
Few among the masses want to acknowledge that the cabal exists, but those who do are not racist because they see it.
It's a time honored method for destabilizing a country, flood it with incompatible foreigners
