It solved it by opting to remaining extremely small. Being small means the basic censorship of illegal material is cheap on relay operators, and accepting remaining small means no one else needs to care about users and their experiences.

Sure if Bluesky ended up just as small as Nostr or merely one order of magnitude better, then Nostr failed cheaper, although you might be surprised how much money is spent on Nostr every month, I heard something like a million dollar, so who knows which network is more efficient at failing to grow 🤔

My point is, no one has any answer to how to build large networks that aren't guaranteed to devolve into centralised platform.

I am trying to encourage people to give up and focus on small networks

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

> It solved it by opting to remaining extremely small

That’s one way of looking at it yeah. I’d just say it solved it by not trying to solve it. Relays and users are all free to do what is best for them. User accounts being separate from relays really solved a whole lot for me.

Either way, a hundred small networks forms one big network, right?

False

This is like saying you don't need Twitter if you have many Matrix public groups.... sure if you want to call that Twitter alternative be my guest. This form of delusion is less wasteful that actually trying to build a Twitter alternative that isn't centralised

I’m not saying that.

Twitter can just become a giant nostr relay (that’s sort of what Primal is tbh). And they can have whatever moderation suits them best. Nostr doesn’t demand there to be one moderation system to rule them all.

User accounts being separate from the relays solves the issue.