dont feel like arguing definitions, in this case lets go with non monetary transactions

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Non-monetary transactions do not belong. #BitcoinIsMoney

Would you agree that most of Satoshi's early transactions are non-monetary? The mined rewards were never moved or used for transactions. Also he inscribed random spam such as newsletter headlines and bloated precious blockspace from the beginning.

Stop with the strawman.

I’m not here to argue semantics — just to clarify a few things.

Spam on Bitcoin has always meant something pretty specific:

transactions designed to clog the network, avoid fees, or disrupt normal usage.

Ordinals don’t do that.

They use standard Bitcoin transactions.

They pay full fees up front when inscribed — and again when sold or transferred.

They feed miners, help build the fee market, and actually reinforce Bitcoin’s long-term security.

So putting all “non-monetary data” in the same category as spam doesn’t really hold up.

Bitcoin is evolving — and with it, our definition of money is too.

People are already using Bitcoin not just for payments,

but to anchor truth, culture, and proof — all timestamped, immutable, and paid for.

That’s not misuse.

That’s exactly what Bitcoin was built to support:

permissionless innovation, with real skin in the game.

Bitcoin isn’t just currency anymore.

It’s a full monetary protocol.

And that opens up a lot more than we imagined at the start.

This is my take on it.