I'm not defending the film. It's bad.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I prefer Denis Villeneuve’s approach

Agreed. It does badly abbreviate much of Herbert's work and intention, though.

More of an essential cliff notes version.

Still, Eminently more entertaining and watchable.

That’s always what I wonder: does a movie adaptation need to be the exact rendition of the book to be a solid entertainment. I guess it depends on the book

Not specifically.

There are plenty of entertaining adaptions that are complete departures from the originator's intent, stylistic choices, etc

That said, what is "entertaining" is every bit as subjective as the definition of art.

Agreed

I also think that harder books to convert to film profit from a complete departure rather than trying to be as close as possible to the story