Replying to Avatar Chris Monetary Maximalist Eleutheropraxeology

Moreover, with diminishing number of regular Bitcoin nodes capable to provide blocks for the newcomer Bitcoin nodes’ IBD phase the chance for growth in regular Bitcoin nodes decentralization would be reduced.

It should be clear, the self-defense is against the threats of diminishing regular Bitcoin node decentralization; not about meaningless bits insertions. Those insertions are simple means for the goal of central entities control taking or not fully thought attempts to take the number one position as an alternative to the actual fiat system.
Avatar
Léo 2y ago

I see I will try to find out more by talking directly with the developer. But I still see a potential, in the event that nodes with low capacity could no longer maintain the reference implementation, Floresta could extend their life span at no extra cost to the node operator.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Chris Monetary Maximalist Eleutheropraxeology 2y ago

I have not read yet the Floresta’s proposal/implementation. :/

Avatar
Léo 2y ago

Here is a brief summary

Avatar
Chris Monetary Maximalist Eleutheropraxeology 2y ago

At a first glance, it looks like it is a lightweight Bitcoin full node (a node that only downloads the block headers instead of the entire history); thus, not useful for newcomer’s IBD phase, since it is not an archival full node. But I can be wrong. I’ve not done enough due diligence regarding that topic.