š„ The Lie: "Full-text indexing is solved"
No. It. Isnāt.
Most of the so-called āenterprise-gradeā full-text indexing tools are bloated Java relics. They eat RAM like itās a free buffet, stall under concurrent writes, and require days of tuning just to not fall over under load. Here's your Hall of Shame:
---
ā ļø The Garbage Heap of Java Indexers
1. Apache Lucene / Elasticsearch
What they claim: "Blazing fast distributed search engine"
Reality:
JVM overhead galore.
GC pauses tank throughput at scale.
Query-time joins? You're punished.
ElasticSearchās cluster coordination? A Kafka tragicomedy.
Memory pressure? Bye bye index performance.
Worst sin: Everything is a plugin, yet none of it works out of the box for sane full-stack use.
---
2. Apache Solr
What they claim: "Highly scalable and reliable search platform"
Reality:
Based on Lucene, so inherits all JVM sins.
Admin UI looks like itās from a 2009 Java EE textbook.
Sharding? Youāll need a PhD in SolrCloud cluster necromancy.
Worst sin: Designed by committee, maintained by inertia.
---
3. OpenSearch (Amazon fork of ES)
What they claim: āOpen-source alternative with performance in mindā
Reality:
Still Java. Still bloated.
Adds a lot of AWS-style duct-tape features nobody asked for.
Less community, more corporate cruft.
Worst sin: A zombie fork that clings to relevance through AWS muscle alone.
---
š½ Why Itās All Broken
Concurrency limits: Threads donāt scale when each is a JVM hog.
I/O bottlenecks: Disk-backed inverted indices are dinosaurs in an SSD/NVMe world.
Hot reloads? Lol. Restart the node and pray.
Streaming data: Kafka in, Kafka out, Kafka hell in between.
---
š£ The Unspoken Truth
We haven't had a breakthrough in efficient, language-agnostic, real-time full-text indexing in decades. The LLM hype has covered up this core infrastructural failure. The actual best solutions are often:
š¹ Rust-based custom search engines (e.g. Tantivy)
š¹ Columnar DBs with text indexing hacks (like ClickHouse)
š¹ SQLite + FTS5 for edge workloads ā embarrasses Solr on small deployments.
---
š§¼ Cleansing the Palate: What You Actually Want
Feature Java Indexers Tantivy / Rust-native Custom BDD + LM Hybrid
RAM usage Laughably bloated Tight and deterministic Controlled per query
GC Hell Constant None None
Concurrent write safety Fragile Stable Event-sourced
Index rebuilds Common Minimal Deterministic
Latency under load Exponential decay Flatline Prioritized
---
š The Future
Itās not Java. Itās not LLMs duct-taped to legacy indexers. Itās:
Rust-based IR systems
Event-sourced pipelines
Content-addressable DAGs
Bitcoin-style PoW indexes that donāt rot
---
If you're building something real, you need an indexer that respects physical limits, not JVM lies. Let the Java dinosaurs rot ā post-GC humanity deserves better.
Want to build that? Letās sketch it.