There was a reasonable motive that has been debunked over and over again. Now it's just recycling old arguments that don't make any sense. To me, that is the definition of bad faith. He is not interested in leaving people alone in the way they want to use Nostr for.
Discussion
"debunked" Who exactly is the arbiter of truth here?
No one told you you "can't" implement edits, just that you "shouldn't". That's an appeal to reason, not an imposition of power. Edit spam is a demonstration, within the rules of the protocol, of that disagreement. Now, if fiatjaf deleted your PR from the github that would be bad, but nothing like that is happening.