They complain that it's so much hard, terrible, thankless work, but I haven't seen a run for the exists or any efficiency improvement in the selection process, so it can't be that bad.

And, now, they've mostly switched to hiring pseudo-employees in full-time on long-term contracts (including themselves), so they're actually just another software company masquerading as a grant charity, with no internal quality controls. But whatever.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

it do be like that

You hit the point. Indeed.

It is an open charity foundation, but it is a closed operation.