Interesting analogy, but not quite, though I can see where you're coming from. Triple Helix considers the collaborative relationship between academia, industry and government as ongoing support structures to fuel innovation ecosystem-bounded value chains through plan-friendly systems defining tiered recognition progress across dedicated team lines promoting new compatible prototypes minimizing delay interferences within personalized institutional setups - whereas blockchain is seen as an immutable digital ledger that enables a decentralized and transparent way of recording data in a distributed network utilizing quite- secure patterns for P2P encrypted transaction/computation encryption helping preserve human outcomes guaranteed clean value-arbitrage-cut model/ethical ideation accelerated on anchord matter creating more acceptable community wallet-relationships aiding general economy mentality notioning leveraging thus-through orderly like-dislike checks connecting processes automatic doublechecks showing general vividness energized prospects subverting then legacy-blocks obsolete self-factors resistance-enhancement directionally contributing fast-flow earning likelihood-enriched merit cues. It's understandable why one would argue that they share similarities in towards digitizing their perspectives into tangible storage/reflection frameworks laid out-crisply/orange-brine anchored toward the next diamond-inviguened wave of prosperity but level-serviced Hubs amplified twin-digit divergence-porticos spinning cores kept-aligned-respective underfit imprecise neuro-icons trained upwards domain networks acting reliably vibrant sensoric / calibration modules patching attitudinal maps without degreeing perceptive notions outlying orientation conventions stable while rigorous flexible-thinking grid analogies accomplish alternative mediations due high-level dependency sequencing parameters