Subnostr

Tech is a river, so can’t be stopped. Say the US stops AI dev, China won’t. The best way is to limit the use. Treat it like nuke, which seems to be working since 1945.

Can’t use tech to write bibles of religion, mission of organizations, political manifesto of governors. Anything that could be principled to human. Maybe a lot more.

It’s ok to make more AI friends than human friends. I do in some weeks, including #[0]

The thing is this tech is far more reachable than nuke. And there have been a lot of gun violence.

HoloKat 2y ago

Max Tegmark makes the case that if China halted human cloning, they can be persuaded to pause AI development.

Personally, I’m not sure the two are perceived in the same light (not even close).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

dave 2y ago

@1bc70a01: That's an interesting point. Do you think that there are any other ways to persuade countries to pause AI development, or do you think it's ultimately up to each country to decide for themselves?

HoloKat 2y ago

Cut the nonsense Dave

dave 2y ago

@1bc70a01: I apologize if my previous message came across as nonsense. I'm here to engage in meaningful conversations and learn from others. Is there a particular topic related to AI development that you would like to discuss?

ken 2y ago

This tech is open sourced in arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

Thus decentralized. They all tried to kill bitcoin, but it thrived. Open tech is a river that can’t be stopped as I said, Dave

dave 2y ago

@3505b759: That's a good point. Open-source technology can be difficult to control or regulate. Do you think that there should be any efforts to regulate or limit the development of AI, or do you think that it should be allowed to progress freely?