I think the largest difference is the ability to fractionally lend can be divorced from the ability to custody.

If you have BTC on-chain you can be certain it is in your custody. Whereas in a bank, the custodian can default and lose what you thought you had.

Fractional lending will certainly continue to exist, but blow-ups can be more localized instead of systemic. Lending will become opt-in.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

And even lending isn't really that big of an issue. The primary problem is that people think they can take their deposit out while it's being lent. And that's just not the case. if all lending occured through CDs where you could not get your money out that would be alright