Even like that article said, that's what we used to do. Pay for for fire departments as an individual service. But it doesn't really work once you start to scale to a city population.
Like, if my neighbor doesn't feel like paying for a monthly fire dept service. They've never had a fire, so I guess they don't see the point.
They go on vacation for a week, and their house catches fire. There's no service for them, so it burns to the ground - but while it burns, the wind catches just the right way to blow it over to my house. I do pay for a fire service, so it gets put out. But now I have property damage to cover because there was no preventative public good to handle it.
I'm not going to be able to recoup costs from my negligent neighbor, his house burned down. He's probably out everything he's ever owned.
Some services tend to be put in place because we've tried not having them and it doesn't work.
Taxes can and do go too far. Privatizing some services just doesn't seem to work though.
Trying to be on the phone arguing with your fire department rep about them denying your coverage for some reason while your house burns down isn't going to work for a number of reasons.
It gets better as we hyperlocalize.
What do you mean by that? I'm not sure how that solves the problem of a negligent neighbor, for example.
Smaller scale. Make the firefighting team be volunteer from within the community. You see this in smaller towns. And the ostracize/shame the neighbor who is not contributing.
When you say make the firefighting team be volunteer. Is this a conscription type thing for the community? Or purely volunteer?
It kind of seems like we're getting to taxes with extra steps.
If not conscription, and just purely volunteer, what if you don't have volunteers? Or enough volunteers? Or a large enough community to be able to handle the coverage distance. There are a lot of rural areas in the country that are miles between houses.
I think the idea is that you need a reliable service that can be called on a moment's notice, that works almost as a preventative measure to keep emergencies from escalating.
Maybe that can be profitable for a company to run, but I'd be surprised if that is the case.
And I don't think you get the necessary reliability (or up to date training and equipment) with a volunteer force.
I don't know. Not everything needs to be taxed, but some stuff sure seems like a necessity for the good of the community.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed