Aren't the videos from 2014?

There are too many inconsistencies for me to consider this AI. What motivation would the military have to release something like this? A fake video to support the crash narrative would be more logical.

If Linn didn't leak this, then what was he arrested and imprisoned for? I believe there was some possible confirmation that a stereoscopic video was provided as evidence in his case.

It is of course possible the videos are AI, but all aspects of the videos look authentic rather than made with CGI. The clouds evolve, they move, the plane and camera movements are natural and the multiple angles all match up too. I think the simplest explanation is they are authentic until we have better evidence that they are not.

To me, the primary reason people doubt the authenticity is because most don't comprehend how aether physics works. Once we understand it, it is clear that this is absolutely possible.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Videos are from mid 2015.

Most of the video is real, I think what we are seeing is mh370 but it's been doctored. The moment of the implosion is possible the explosion of the plane.

We could be seeing the last moment of the plane.

It could also be a test, a show of force to China.

Needless to say, I base my evidence on the events of the night, the ATC calls etc. and not anything past a week of the search.

"The coordinates next to it are the real location of MH370 on March 7th, 2014 around 18:40UTC. This location was not known to the public until May 28th, 2014 when the raw telemetry data was released. The video was published 9 days prior on May 19th, 2014."

These are the only dates I have seen. What's the corroboration for the 2015 date? I haven't heard that date up until now.

I have some experience with compositing and video editing over the years, and when I look at the videos carefully it would be very difficult to fake. If anything, a show of force would be far better at getting the message to China if it is indeed real.

Until anything comes out that would conclusively debunk them, I still lean towards authentic.