So you’re stressing autonomous that the “members” or “participant” have little say on the organizing aspect except as swarm. Others seek to organize in an autonomous space that is horizontal. The CDC case you mentioned frowned on this organizing principle as organizations are defined with members that carry responsibility for their investments. The swarm organizing principle of Bitcoin is comprised of autonomous individuals more in line with market dynamics. I see a problem in using organization as a noun in this case.

Swarm dynamics would be decentralized autonomous organizing.

I suppose then DAO as organized entity rather than self-organizing entity still has some conceptual and legal work to do to come in line with current corporate, commerce and contract law.

It’s nice to see this divergence of principles innovating commerce and corporate entities in different ways.

Exciting times.