I agree with pippellia that follows are dominant for a good reason, and they’re a good place to start.

Unlike pippellia, I am ALSO very interested in creating new types of interactions like those proposed in Constant’s article. This does not require bootstrapping a new network effect, assuming we can layer the new data (what’s proposed in the article) on top of the starting data (follows).

Arguments that take the form: “I don’t like method A because method B is better” don’t apply when you can use methods A and B together and get something better than either method by itself. It’s not an either-or. It’s both-and.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.