Nostr Web Client

Replying to

+boldmouse096⚡️

I've watched this video months ago.

It concerns wasabi 1.0

According Samourai, there are serious flaws in wasabi conjoin implementation (at least in version 1.0)

Disclaimer:

I'm a retarded pleb.

Don't trust me at all.

I run 2 dojos (ronin dojo, and dojo on bare metal - installed according tutorial from raspibolt.org), and I'm also conjoining using sparrow wallet.

I'm using Samourai wallet and cahoots as postmix strategy.

Bitcoin is permissionless protocol, so wasabi blocking utxos (based on CA data) from conjoining is IMHO against the ethos of Bitcoin.

So from this reason for me wasabi is absolutely no go.🚩

Anyways, Bitcoin is different things for different people, everybody can do what they want.

Stallion 2y ago

thanks for the opinion. Appreciated. I am trying to figure out if wabisabi 2.0. is having any issue with address reuse. Blocking UTXOs is another topic.

What i want to crack and understand how that works with address reuse if theres any flaw in the code that might happen. Would be much appreciated if others can answer. Who sees and understands that.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Django 2y ago

The address reuse issue should be already fixed in 2.0

+boldmouse096⚡️ 2y ago

We'll see whether Wabisabi will get demixed.

Django 2y ago

Indeed.