With the etfs being likely to get approved, it might be wise for the SEC to enforce additional requirement for issuers.
Taking a percentage of issuers management fees to support bitcoin OS development is the least to do IMO. Neutral nonprofit to distribute funds of course.
Don't give them ideas. Do you really want the government involved in the furthering Bitcoin's development?
They will have to at some point
Please elaborate. Governments will be less relevant in a hyper-bitcoinized world. Why do they have to get involved in Bitcoin development?
If they're less relevant, they would want to be relevant. In any case, it's almost impossible for them to stay neutral IMO. They will have to secure or attack. Hence, I said they will have to get involved in development.
