Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar waxwing

i think it's really important to remember the inhuman nature of this problem. If you have a fitness regime and you miss one day, oh well, just keep going. If you are Satoshi Nakamoto and doing an entire huge project under a pseudonym, you only have to make *one* slight mistake to undo *years* of work at privacy. Just ask Ross Ullbricht about this (and he's far from the only one). So yes, reduce your digital footprint, but mostly that's not with a goal of any kind of anonymity, because for most people most of the time that's not an attainable goal. It's mostly because it's better for your general security.

nostr:nevent1qqsdsyalhrsn34jagtjs4sj0q99cng5dreavye82hvhhg04v8jg7f7gpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygpm0lyzxcglrt4w5clw80mfkfdc4gtwcm5p6xhu8ypxsz87r9p4fupsgqqqqqqshy52ch

Avatar
GHOST 6mo ago

That's where compartmentalization comes in. Keeping your digital selves and their activities separate. The name, profile picture, and email you use on LinkedIn doesn't have to be the same one you use to shit post online.

I cover that and guides for people who have higher threat profiles in my book: UNTRACEABLE.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
waxwing 6mo ago

I agree compartmentalizion is a crucial concept here. But my point still stands. Crossing those boundaries is way too easy to accidentally do.

Thread collapsed