I don’t care if my sats are KYC or not, there I said it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

There, more KYC

Not sure why you would say this.

Wouldn’t you rather have financial privacy?

I already have more privacy than the banking system even with KYC sats + if even if I stack non-KYC and the government really wanted to find out if I owned bitcoin they’d be able to figure it out unless you go above and beyond. I’m more concerned about stacking as many sats as possible than i am hiding my stack from someone who could find out about it if they really cared to. I don’t plan on doing anything illegal with my bitcoin so I don’t really care. 99% of people will own KYC as adoption continues to grow.

Maybe Pat in the Blue is phishing for those hoodlums and coinjoin users.

Yep, you’ve all outed yourselves! Time to call the IRS!

?cid=2154d3d7h0zltot12234nzl6iypjfpcqeenlbu14ctuhouis&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

This is great 😂

Most won't care, until you need to care. Keep your KYC / non-KYC stacks separate. Or even better, have one stack but use a coin join wallet. Wasabi is pretty awesome, is does it all automatically! If you try Wasabi, make sure you edit the default mixing settings though, the max privacy setting coin joins your stack like 10 times lol, you'll use 1/3 to fees. Two times is more then enough IMO. Although it's easy to determine coin-joins on chain, many inputs with many outputs.

Why would I ever need to care?

Side note, I’ve heard many HWWs are integrating coinjoin into their suites, which is cool if true.

Don't know about that but Sparrow wallet let's you coinjoin directly into cold storage.

Agreed who cares fuck thr governemtn they cant have my btc anyway

You will

Knock knock goes the state representative!

It won’t matter when we win. Good luck trying to chain analyse a circular BTC economy.