There is a case to made that voting for the worst politicians will actually expedite the collapse of their corrupt systems.
Politics and political systems cannot be fixed (especially by voting) so game theory dictates it actually is a better outcome if they implode under their own corruption sooner rather than later.
I haven't talked about "fixing" things, but rather maintaining a more or less livable status quo where taxes don't skyrocket overnight, where carrying a gun isn't illegal, where being a Bitcoin developer isn't persecuted. What you don't understand is that the legal basis is affected depending on who comes to power, and to more or less control who has a monopoly on violence, the only solution is to vote. Not voting doesn't fix things or propose solutions; it's simply a failure to act, a failure to make decisions, a nihilism that serves no purpose.
Vote harder it’ll continue to do absolutely nothing for you.
If you really cared about improving the legal basis you lived under you would get citizenship in a more favorable jurisdiction and put your physical, mental and monetary energy there. Instead you vote for who you perceive to be the least shitty tyrant who cucks you however they want regardless.
Your “solution” just works until the politicians of that’s jurisdiction become tyrants as well. LOL
Voting is just a prevention, if it doesn’t work you can leave but you tried. Now if you don’t do nothing, you are just a cold-warm depending on others decisions.
If you're telling me that voting for a communist or voting for Thomas Massie is the same thing and is useless, it means you haven't understood anything.
So you’d rather stay in a country that’s already lost the plot rather than move to one that has a far better current political climate because you’re scared they’ll end up in the same position as you’re in currently? Lmao you sound like a victim.
Thomas massie has zero effect on DC 😂😂 the apparatus does whatever it wants and steamrolls guys like massie.
The uniparty is impenetrable and will continue to rule as it sees fit until it implodes under its own corruption and/or until they lose the power to print money of value at will.
You still don't understand a word, impressive. What I'm saying is that inaction always leads to failure. And YOUR inaction depends on the decisions that OTHERS make in the jurisdiction in which you live.
Your premise is objectively incorrect. There has been massive amounts of voting the entire way to the current political and societal climate. For both red and blue. Both think they’re right, and both are retarded.
The action of voting and subsequent unending centrally planned interventions from both political parties has gotten the world exactly where it’s at today. It is not the way. Hope you can break out of your delusional cuck-state someday.
I repeat it twice, I am not going to defend politicians who are garbage, however in the most basic of the legislative constitution of each partisan proposal there are substantial differences. And again, why is carrying weapons ok in Texas and not in California? Because what does matter is to live more or less well and not governed by tyrants who decide for us how much taxes to pay, impose absurd laws on gender identity, sexualize children, etc. These are issues that in the legislative basis and in the MORAL foundation of each person make a huge difference in order to vote to doctrine kids with gay porn or make the kids love God and their country.
