Regarding your article:

If it comes to a civil war related to supply inflation like you mentioned in the article which is certainly probable, I will side with those who don't want to change the existing rule set and keep the supply and issuance schedule intact. Some economists might suggest an inflation, but I reject their suggestion. Once again, they free to run a different version of Bitcoin and I will not force them to think the way I think or to run the code I run.

The network has hundreds of millions of participants now (will be billions in the future) so changes will entail far greater complexities than it used to during the early days when developers and miners had a lot more control. Hence, there will be an insane amount resistance to them based not on dogma or 'maximalism', but on elementary self-interest and self-preservation.

Coming to consensus for anything will become almost impossible. This is inevitable.

So not only will miners and businesses be very unhappy at some point in the future, so will the developers.